What to make of the SVB crisis?

En bref

Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) is an important financial institution for Tech start-ups. The SVB crisis is a classic bank run, with many of the Tech clients burning cash too quickly, which implied a steep drop of deposits, and a deteriorating liquidity position at SVB. On 8 March the bank announced unexpected deposit withdrawals this year and the liquidation of the bulk of its Available for Sale (AFS) securities at a $2bn loss.


  • The crisis faced by Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), and Signature Bank, is a classical bank run – in the digital era.
  • A large part of the risk seems idiosyncratic, as high duration assets and exposure to the technology sector made the banks particularly vulnerable to the sharp increase in rates.
  • Yet with nearly 90% of affected bank deposits unprotected by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), the risk of contagion was still high, triggering the Fed and US Treasury to step in with a new generous liquidity support program and an extension of the protection to large depositors at all banks.
  • This is a major step to contain the market rout and prevent it from spilling over to healthy institutions, while (again) raising  moral hazard concerns for the future. Yet the crisis will create further headwinds to the US financial system, fanning the battle for bank deposits (in the context of intense competition from money market funds), leading to a greater  concentration of deposits in the favour of large banks, and limiting the provision of credit to the wider econ-omy. The systemic component of the crisis lies in the large amount of unrealised losses across financial institutions – not just banks – which creates an inherent fragility, especially in the case of suddenly rising liquidity needs.
  • These events will further complicate the job of central banks, as they still seek to tame inflation. The joint tightening of  financial conditions and lending standards does increase the recession risk. Barring a further escalation of the stress over the coming days, we still expect the Fed and ECB to envisage further rate hikes in March. A 50bp hike by the Fed appears highly unlikely, but we still deem a 25bp move more likely than a pause.
  • The events add to the case for maintaining a prudent exposure to risk assets for now, while US Treasuries still have appeal as a good hedge against financial market stress.
  • European banks also suffer from greater investor scrutiny, but overall appear better positioned than their US peers on various risk and valuation measures.

Download the publication below:

What to make of the SVB crisis?

© Generali Investments, tous droits réservés. Ce site web est géré par Generali Investments Holding S.p.A. en tant que société holding des sociétés de gestion d'actifs du Groupe Generali ayant, directement ou indirectement, une participation majoritaire dans les sociétés énumérées ci-dessous (ci-après dénommées conjointement "Generali Investments"). Ce site web peut contenir des informations relatives à l'activité des sociétés suivantes : Generali Asset Management S.p.A. Società di gestione del risparmio, Infranity, Sycomore Asset Management, Aperture Investors LLC (y compris Aperture Investors UK Ltd), Plenisfer Investments S.p.A. Società di gestione del risparmio, Lumyna Investments Limited, Sosteneo S. p.A. Società di gestione del risparmio, Generali Real Estate S.p.A. Società di gestione del risparmio, Conning* et ses filiales Global Evolution Asset Management A/S - y compris Global Evolution USA, LLC et Global Evolution Fund Management Singapore Pte. Ltd - Octagon Credit Investors, LLC, Pearlmark Real Estate, LLC ainsi que Generali Investments CEE. *Englobe Conning, Inc, Conning Asset Management Limited, Conning Asia Pacific Limited, Conning Investment Products, Inc, Goodwin Capital Advisers, Inc (désignés comme "Conning").